What is typically the main difference between SIP and lockdown procedures?

The main difference between Shelter-in-Place (SIP) procedures and lockdown procedures lies in their intended responses to specific types of threats. SIP is designed to protect individuals from external threats, such as an active shooter or hazardous materials release, by instructing them to remain indoors, secure the building, and limit exposure to the outside environment. This is crucial during situations where it is safer to stay put than to evacuate.

On the other hand, lockdown procedures are primarily enacted in response to internal threats, such as an active shooter within the premises. During a lockdown, individuals are instructed to secure themselves in a room or area, often locking doors and turning off lights to remain undetected by the threat.

This distinction emphasizes the context in which each procedure is applied: SIP focuses on external dangers and staying sheltered indoors, while lockdown is implemented in situations where individuals may be facing an immediate danger from within their environment. Understanding this difference is vital for effectively responding to various emergency situations, ensuring the safety of individuals based on the nature of the threat they are encountering.