What is a common mistake in documenting use of force incidents?

Substituting conclusions for factual information is a common mistake in documenting use of force incidents because it undermines the integrity of the report. Accurate documentation in security and law enforcement is crucial, as it serves not only for internal reviews but also for potential legal scrutiny. When conclusions are presented instead of objective facts, it introduces bias and may lead to misunderstandings about the incident. The documentation should focus on what happened, including observable actions and behaviors, rather than interpretations or subjective opinions. Objective facts provide a clearer and more reliable account of the event, ensuring that anyone reviewing the report has a truthful basis to understand the circumstances surrounding the use of force. This practice helps maintain transparency and accountability in security operations.