What is a common mistake in documenting use of force incidents?

Substituting conclusions for factual information is a common mistake when documenting use of force incidents because it undermines the integrity and accuracy of the report. Documentation in such cases needs to be objective and rely on observable facts rather than personal interpretations or assumptions about the situation. By presenting conclusions as if they were established facts, it can lead to misunderstandings, misinterpretations, and could potentially be used against the officer if the situation is scrutinized later.

Accurate documentation plays a crucial role in ensuring accountability and transparency and helps to provide a clear account of what happened during the incident. This is vital not only for maintaining legal protections for the officer involved but also for establishing the credibility of the report. It ensures that any investigations or reviews based on the report can be conducted with the right context and understanding of the events that transpired.